The popular scientific material acquaints the reader with various theories of an origin of the person, including the divine theory, the theory of an alien origin, and also Charles Darvina’s theory and modern hypotheses of an anthropogeny.
Beyond the unknown
Beyond the unknown
There are the errors having visibility of truth
Lutsy Ania Seneca
The XX century was an eyelid of opening. Many from living, using mobile phones, system the Internet, admiring opening in astrophysics, genetic engineering, other directions, remember kresalo and a splinter, an oxen, as draft force, wind and water-mills. Time of opening stepped far forward. However many opening led to big riddles. One of them still has an origin of the person. Throughout many generations attempts to understand and explain were undertaken how there was a person, why it came to this world. All of them found the reflection in beliefs and legends, myths and legends of the most different tribes and the people. But the truth and remained under an impenetrable cover of secret. And only in recent years it was possible to raise slightly from it a veil.
The problem of an origin of the person involved the best minds of mankind. Among numerous theories and versions which were nominated the last centuries and exist now, three main are noteworthy: the first – the theory of a divine origin, to be exact divine participation in an origin of the person. This situation is put in all religions of the world. Also God told: yes the earth will make soul live by the nature of it. Also became so. God of animals terrestrial by the nature of them, and cattle by the nature of it, and all reptiles terrestrial by the nature of them created. God also saw that it is good. God also told: create also the person on our image, on our similarity … God of the person on the image also created, on the God’s image created it …. So describes emergence of people the Bible (one of versions of the theory of creation can consider also myths about transformation of animals into people and about the birth of the first people gods). And it must be said that for a long time this theory didn’t cause any doubts. However with science development in the theory of divine creation holes began to appear. First, at comparison of human anatomy and animals unusual similarity between them is evident. For example, the highest mammals, as well as the person, have similar four-chamber heart, the lungs, equal number of departments of a brain. Secondly, females of mammals, as well as the woman, raise cubs milk. And, at last, thirdly, at comparison of three-week germs of a rat, a dog and a monkey it became clear that embryos are similar at each other as three drops of water. All this didn’t keep within in any way idea of a divine origin and exclusiveness of the person. Under the influence of the scientific facts the theory of a divine origin began to fade into the background. And in spite of the fact that completely it is impossible to disprove it, many educated minds of a planet began to reflect and look for other explanations of appearance of the person.
The first step was made by Charles Linnya. In the classification of types of live beings it placed the person in group of primacies together with a monkey, motivating with similarity of a structure of their ph. Linney’s works were an incitement for further studying of similarities and distinctions between the person and an animal and gave possibilities to the French scientist Lamarck to create the first theory about a natural origin of the person from ancient monkeys. Soon, to be exact in 1871, English scientist Charles Darvin, being based on the scientific researches and on Lamarck’s works, offered the second theory about an origin of the person. This theory assumed that the person occurred from the highest primacies – anthropoids – by gradual modification under the influence of external factors and natural selection. Darwin and its followers managed to give a number of conclusive proofs for that time, and the theory of an evolutionary origin of people began to get more and more supporters. And as nothing equivalent could be offered at that time, for many years nobody tried to challenge the theory of Darwin. But the science isn’t necessary on a place. In the XX century, an eyelid of opening what it was mentioned in introduction, in the Darvinian theory of open steel of an error which every year became more and more.
Let’s stop only on separate, the main. First, according to the assumption of Darwin, in the course of intraspecific reproduction certain animals have new qualities therefore some of representatives of a look get of advantage before others and have more chances to survive in changing habitat. Therefore the qualities acquired by them are fixed and transferred to descendants. Over time changes in organisms become so considerable that there is a new look. Really that what descendants of penguins, having learned to rise slightly at first over water, like the southern American wefts can prevent to believe us, eventually can come off a sea surface and soar in the sky? But if to accept it on trust, by itself there is a question: where transitional forms? Darwin realized that lack of transitional forms is a serious gap in its theory. In the well-known book "Origin of species" he wrote: The quantity of the transitional forms which were earlier existing on Earth, should be really huge. So why all geological layers aren’t filled with remains of these intermediate forms? While it is clear that the geology doesn’t reveal expected gradation of links of an organic chain, and it, the most convincing and weighty objection which opponents of my theory can bring is possible. Results of excavation and don’t confirm up to now existence of transitional forms.
Secondly, kingdoms of animals and plants are divided into groups on certain sets of signs. So far paleontologic data didn’t give to scientists of a key to an origin solution even one of these groups. Known French zoologist-evolyutsionist Pierre Grass notes: Because of almost total absence of the paleontologic certificates explaining an origin of groups, any explanation of the mechanism of evolution (across Darwin) will be extremely gipotetichno. This statement should stand an epigraph to each book on evolution …
And thirdly, especially undermine belief in validity of the evolutionary theory so-called "abnormal" finds of fossil remains of the person. According to the existing theory, humanoids started to develop from anthropoids about four million years ago in Africa. The first hominids (chelovekoobezyany), or Australopithecuses had a body reminding human and the head more similar to the head of a monkey. Australopithecuses migrated on various continents. About 200 thousand years ago there were first representatives of the person reasonable, still a little similar to the modern person. About 100 thousand years ago there was a Neanderthal person who was settled in Europe. At last about 40 thousand years ago in the Middle East and in Asia there are first representatives of the modern person, and rudiments of a modern civilization lag behind today approximately on 10 thousand years. The standard ideas of evolutionary development of the person are that. However there is a set of certificates which aren’t entered in this scenario. Here some of these facts.
In the town Bordsk Keyv (South Africa) quite recently paleontologists found the remains of the ancient person which have forced scientists it is essential to reconsider temporary terms. In their opinion, emergence anatomic the modern person occurred not less than 110 thousand years ago, instead of 40 thousand years as across Darwin. As a result there was the third theory about our origin – the theory of external intervention which every day gets more and more supporters. According to this theory, appearance of people on Earth is anyway connected with activity of other civilizations. In the simplest version of the alien theory of an origin of the person people are lineal descendants of the aliens who have landed to Earth during prehistoric times (as the proof are offered pictures of Mars on which it is possible to see the remains of the structures similar to the Egyptian pyramids). But there are also more difficult options. Such, as crossing inomiryan with ancestors of people; generation of the person reasonable methods of genetic engineering; management of evolutionary development of terrestrial life of powers of extraterrestrial superreason and evolutionary development of terrestrial life and reason according to the program which has been initially put by extraterrestrial superreason (haldeysky and Hindu philosophical regilioznye sources). By the way two last versions a little than differ from the theory of divine intervention. To reasonable intervention from the outside indirectly points also stay on Earth of many unknown fossil objects (artifacts – it is planned to the publication).
There are also other hypotheses of an anthropogeny. The most widespread is the hypothesis of spatial anomalies. Her followers treat an anthropogeny as an element of development of steady spatial anomaly – a humanoid triad the Matter – Energy – Aura, the characteristic Universe for many planets and terrestrial analogs in parallel spaces. The concept consists in the following. In the humanoid Universes on the majority of planets suitable for life the biosphere develops on the same way programmed at level of Aura - information substance. In the presence of favorable conditions this way leads to emergence of humanoid reason of terrestrial type. In principle this hypothesis is a peculiar hybrid between the Darvinian theory and divine intervention. And it is quite possible, what exactly a hypothesis of spatial anomalies as one of branches of the theory of external intervention will appear the closest to truth. That is why representatives of the various scientific directions meet in the uniform – the reason of an origin of the person needs to be looked for not only on Earth but also in Space.
Instead of an epilogue
Modern scientific preconditions no other than quicksand of the truth hidden behind seven seals.
Apostle Pavel spoke: The more I know, the I understand less.
A.Hale, the astrophysicist, carrying out calculations, illustrated a life origin such example: spread out on a platform all details of the big airliner disassembled to a small screw and wait a whirlwind. Probability of emergence of a live cage same, as that the whirlwind will casually collect all details in the plane ready to a departure.
There is a speech about a live cage above and what to speak about the whole organism, about the person with incomprehensibly large number of harmoniously combined live cages, an organism allocated with feelings, instincts, the intuition, what "whirlwind" could collect all this!?
Demal.
(Popular scientific review).